Thursday, January 12, 2023

Where's My Battleship?


With the possible exception of thermonuclear devices, I think a free person's arsenal should be limited only by their checkbook and mental health status. Though I would not be opposed to variation on the Swiss system of encouraging responsible gun ownership and marksmanship proficiency.

2 comments:

  1. Had no problems with cannon and mortars either... Why it is illegal now for us to have them is they are scared chicken shat and afraid we would use them on them... We would and still could...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cederq, I'm no NFA expert, but I thought cannon and mortars were legal to own subject to the $200 tax stamp plus each round was it's own destructive device subject to another stamp. Which would explain why private ownership of functional specimens is rare assuming I'm correct.

      Delete

I am not easily offended. Please feel free to express your opinions: good, bad or indifferent. Basically, the "Golden Rule" applies. You get what you give. Treat others like trash here, and your comments will be trashed accordingly. Rudeness and vulgarity will not be tolerated.